The family and integral ecology


April 14-15, 2021

In preparation for the 2022 PASS Plenary on 'The family as a relational good: the challenge of love’

Concept Note

All surveys conducted at national and international levels show that the family is at the top of the scale of people’s values under every latitude. People claim that the family is the most important thing in their lives. However, when one tries to clarify what is meant by ‘family’, one enters a field of great uncertainties and contingencies as to the affective, cognitive and symbolic references that the idea and the experience of the family brings with it. In all cases, the challenge is how to think and live the love between family members. It is therefore a question of specifying, understanding and evaluating the different answers to this challenge that emerge today in people’s life-worlds. What is the ideal of the family? And what is its reality? In the gap between everyday experience and the desired ideal of a beautiful family lies the challenge of love.

We are all aware that the family is undergoing profound social and cultural transformations that must be understood and valued in their scope and in their consequences. If we consider the deep and rapid changes that the family faces today all over the world, due to the processes of modernization and globalization, it seems necessary to ask ourselves some basic questions that push us to rethink the fundamentals of the family and its reasons for existence in the present society and in the near future: “why the family, and what for?”. What are the roots of the family as a natural society and to what extent can culture change them? What reasons support the necessity and the goodness of the family beyond the changes in its social functions?

The plenary intends to answer these questions. It is intended to assess the phenomenology of the family in the contemporary world from the point of view of the social sciences and social policies, in order to offer the Catholic social teaching in-depth elements of knowledge about the current situation and, as far as possible, the near future on a global level.

By referring to the analysis of social facts, the conference will reflect on the family on the horizon of its ontological being and in the perspective of exercising its primary tasks. It is a question of understanding how the family can today humanize the person in a society that is not always friendly with the family. The purpose of the Plenary, preceded by this webinar, is not to draw up a general descriptive report (there are plenty of them, at national and international level), but to focus on the lines of thought and action that can best support the family in the world of tomorrow. On the one hand, we need to clarify the deeper meaning of the family’s existence – family ontology, from the social, philosophical and theological viewpoints – and, on the other, to evaluate the practical implications for a better family promotion – social policies and good practices in family services – in the perspective of an integral human ecology. In order to survive, our society needs ‘family friendly’ policies. It is still a question of implementing article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State”). To implement these human rights, it seems appropriate to deepen the meaning of family relationships today, taking into account the fact that they are necessary for the humanization of people, but also strongly contingent on the life course of people. The target is to make the family flourish as the primary relational good of society. To say that the family is a relational good means to affirm that the destiny and happiness of people depend on the fact that they consider and share family relationships as their fundamental common good. This common good is created by family members, but it is not particularistic and does not remain closed in the private sphere, because it pours its benefits on the community around with positive externalities that constitute the social capital of large social networks.

Modern social sciences have shown that family changes decide the most profound and significant changes in society. Every new society is the fruit of new family models. In the apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia (AL), Pope Francis proposes a realistic approach to the theme of the family. He invites us to see the family not as an abstract ideal, but as a “craft” task (AL 16) which must be approached with tenderness (AL 28), considering that the Word of God “is not shown as a sequence of abstract theses, but as a traveling companion also for families who are in crisis or experiencing some pain, and indicate the destination of the journey” (AL 22). He writes: “anthropological-cultural change, that today influences all aspects of life and requires an analytic and diversified approach, does not permit us to limit ourselves to practices in pastoral ministry and mission that reflect forms and models of the past. We must be informed and impassioned interpreters of the wisdom of faith in a context in which individuals are less well supported than in the past by social structures, and in their emotional and family life. With the clear purpose of remaining faithful to the teaching of Christ, we must therefore look, with the intellect of love and with wise realism, at the reality of the family today in all its complexity, with its lights and its shadows” (AL 32).

Thinking of the family as a relational good and putting this concrete idea into practice in social policies and welfare services, can be a way to build a new ‘good society.’

Last but not least, there is the theological subject, since Jesus Christ intended the family to be a sacrament, indeed the only sacrament of social order as such. Being a sacrament means that the people who enact it, i.e. its ministers, are instruments of Christ’s grace, which is a participation of his divine nature (2 Pt 1:4). Therefore, the question is how a husband, wife and any children can be made aware of this in order to enact the grace of this sacrament properly in their lives.

Moreover, since the family is considered the cell of social order, how can this grace of the sacrament of marriage be extended to the entire suffering social order, in order to renew it in Jesus Christ?

Pierpaolo Donati



The family as relational good: the challenge of love

Plenary Session, 27-29 April 2022 | All surveys conducted at national and international levels... Read more

YouTube Playlist


The Grace of Christ in the Cell of the Social Order

Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo According to Melissa Eitenmiller,[1] it appears that many theologians and... Read more

What has to be expected from the Plenary 2022

Pierpaolo Donati Academician Alma Mater Professor of Sociology, University of Bologna,... Read more

Philosophers’ insights on the family in the light of contemporary challenges: an enlightening contrast

Prof. Ana Marta González, University of Navarra When speaking of family, it is not always easy to... Read more

The Family and Integral Ecology: Introductory Remarks

Stefano Zamagni PASS President  As Aristotle wrote in Politics (I, pt. 2), the family is “the... Read more

Philosophy and the Family

Vittorio Hösle The family is, like other social institutions (economy, politics), based on... Read more

The Polyhedron of the Family in Latin America. From toxic individualism to the larger, common home

The Polyhedron of the Family in Latin America From toxic individualism to the larger, common... Read more

The Changing Phases of African Marriage and Family: Perspectives on Nigeria in the African Context

Kokunre Agbontaen-Eghafona Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University if Benin, Benin... Read more

©2012-2017 The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences


Share Mail Twitter Facebook